Independent Counsel Investigation

Turmoil rocked Heaven this morning as allegations arose that God had an affair with a former worshiper. The scandal began when a 21 year old woman, known only as Mary, claimed that she had given birth to God’s “only son” in a barn in the hamlet of Bethlehem.

Sources close to Mary claim that she “had loved God for a long time”, that she was constantly talking about her relationship with God, and that she was “thrilled to have had this child.” In a press conference this morning, God issued a vehement denial, saying that “No sexual relationship existed:, and that “the facts of this story will come out in time, verily.”

Independent counsel Robert M. Beelzebub immediately filed a brief with the Justice department to expand his investigation to cover questions of whether any commandments may have been broken, and whether God had illegally funneled laundered money to his illegitimate child through three foreign operatives known only as the “Wise men.” Beelzebub has issued subpoenas to several angels who are rumored to have acted as go-betweens in the affair.

Critics have pointed out that these allegations have little to do with the charges that Beelzebub was originally appointed to investigate, that God had created large-scale flooding in order to cover up evidence of a failed land deal.

In recent months, Beelzebub’s investigation has already been expanded to cover questions surrounding the large number of locusts that plagued God’s political opponents in the last election, as well as to claims that the destruction of the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah was to divert attention away from a scandal involving whether the giveaway of a parcel of public land in Promised County to a Jewish special interest group was quid pro quo for political contributions.

If these allegations prove to be true, then this could be a huge blow to God’s career, much of which has been spent crusading for stricter moral standards and harsher punishments for wrongdoers. Indeed, God recently outlined a “tough-on-crime” plan consisting of a series of 10 “Commandments”, which has been introduced in Congress in a bill by Rep. Moses. Critics of the bill have pointed out that it lacks any provisions for the rehabilitation of criminals, and lawyers for the ACLU are planning to fight the “Name in Vain” commandment as being an unconstitutional restriction on free speech.

Stay tuned to CNN for further coverage.

To link to this blog post, please copy and paste this URL
https://tinyurl.com/y3a6r3oc

Personal Freedom, My Guide and Compass

I self-identify as a human being, American, politically Conservative, Christian, heterosexual male who respects your right to do whatever you damn well please so long as your desire to do whatever you damn well please does not infringe or impede my right to do whatever I damn well please or the rights of others to do whatever they damn well please!

That is the foundation principle [personal freedom] for the establishment of The United States of America. It is the core of the Declaration of Independence and was the seminal and innovative principle governing the debate about and writing of the Constitution of The United States.

Personal freedom for myself and everyone else and all that phrase implies dictates my thoughts, politics, writings, worldview, and faith.

While most of the Founders were men of religious faith, many were not. However, they all recognized that the rights of personal freedom were part of "Natural Law" and are independent of a personal belief in God. Thomas Jefferson was very careful to state in the Declaration that "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Jefferson's use of the word "Creator" was intentional. It leaves open the interpretation as "God" for those who believe in God and Nature for those that do not.

Some people say that freedom means, not necessarily "free to do whatever you damn well please," but rather to do what you ought to do. I take issue with that interpretation. "Ought" must be defined by someone. That definition requires some human to determine what some other human "Ought" to do. That is very democrat and even socialist.

Liberty and freedom means doing whatever you damn well please so long as it does not infringe on someone else. Otherwise, some other person is making your decisions and that is anathema to liberty and freedom.

You do not get to decide what I ought to do.

To link to this blog post, please copy and paste this URL.
https://tinyurl.com/y6j3t55u

Medical Standard of Care 

The medical "Standard of Care" is a moving target, a gaseous cloud.

It is an indefinable and unpublished definition.  It is a concept that was developed by trial lawyers for medical malpractice law suits.   Unfortunately, doctors now must address the patient’s needs for medical care within the confines of this shadowy framework or be attacked by their state medical board if they try to “THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX.”

Those who define the standard are often not experts in the field. For example, state medical boards are made up of medical doctors, chiropractors, osteopathic physicians, podiatrists and even non-medically trained community active "civilians."  Now, I may be naive, but why would anyone think a chiropractor or "civilian" could properly judge the quality of medical care provided by an endocrinologist, pediatrician, neurosurgeon or any other highly specialized medical practitioner?  (For that matter, why would any one think a medical doctor should sit in judgment of a chiropractor?)

To make matters worse, state legislatures attempt to apply law to medical care!  State law governing medical care is an attempt to apply a static solution to a fluid situation.  A law has to be clearly defined to be enforceable.  A citizen must be able to read the law and know what is legal and what is not.  Since medicine is constantly changing, state law will always lag behind the state of the art in medical advancement or the law will have to be vaguely worded. Kansas statutes, (the state I am most familiar with), empowers the state board to enforce a medical standard of care “As determined by the board.”  Doctors in Kansas have been censured, suspended or even had their license revoked because the state board concluded that widely accepted medical practices were “Below the standard of care.”

Often medical boards will use only one doctor’s opinion to establish “their” meaning of standard of care.  Never mind that the medical care practiced by the doctor under assault is leading edge medicine and the exact care needed by that particular patient, the lawyers and agenda driven doctors at the state board are going to take the doctor down for contravention of state law!  It’s wrong and if doctors continue to allow the abuse it will only get worse.  Doctors work hard to achieve the status of Doctor of Medicine.  Their life is often destroyed because they got on the wrong side of a medical board, even though their knowledge and treatment of patients was cutting edge medicine.  I recently had a colonoscopy.  The only thing my doctor knew about the State Board of Healing Arts is that they sign his license to practice.  He was shocked when I told him the stories of abuse of doctors by the Medical Board.

Vague laws give state boards power beyond the mandate to “Protect the health and safety of the citizens.”  Many state medical boards launch witch hunts, are in the pocket of the drug companies and/or medical insurance companies.  One doctor told me, “Any doctor who is not a pimp for the insurance company and a whore for the pharmaceutical company will find himself in trouble with the State Board.”  Unfortunately, that moving target, the standard of care, is being used to destroy some of the best doctors in the country.

Link to this blog post, copy and paste this URL  https://tinyurl.com/9c7k4vbn