Sunday, March 29, 2015

Our Broken Immigration System

The question was asked "Could somebody tell me what's 'broken'
within the immigration system?  I simply don't understand why the current system, if enforced, is not workable." In order to address the question and the follow-up statement, it is necessary to understand what Democrats means when they say that a particular law or some aspect of a government program is "broken."


First, understand that politicians do not speak English. Most Americans speak and understand English as defined by "The Oxford Dictionary of the English Language" or "The Merriam-Webster Dictionary of American English." Political language utilizes the same words but groups within the body politic understand those words very differently. For example, when a democrat/liberal politician uses the word “bipartisan” he/she means that the Republicans/Conservatives must march in lockstep with their decision. Conservatives understand the word to mean that there is general agreement and consensus on a subject or issue.


Democrats, specifically "liberals," fall into discernible subgroups. The largest group within the liberal universe might be described as “Liberal Utopians.” They believe that society has an obligation to make sure everyone is equal socially and economically. They refuse to recognize that people are different and will be unequal just because they are different. 


Liberal utopians blindly embrace socialism and its accompanying high taxes and government control of society. They see government as the great equalizer and willingly, even happily, submit to the requisite intrusion into their lives. They disdain capitalism and personal responsibility. They look at our immigration system as unfair to the downtrodden masses of the world. 

Since liberals also view America as a world evil, they adhere to the notion that the downtrodden are in their situation because of policies forced upon the world by the evil United States. Liberal utopians embrace a borderless society as part of the solution to an unfair society. They also support higher taxes so the “less fortunate” can have what they consider "a better life." Naturally, the administrator of that confiscated wealth is to be the same government that has repeatedly demonstrated its only skill is creating more poor downtrodden masses. 

They blindly vote for the next group.


The second major group within liberal society is the “Liberal Elites.” All liberal elites are also utopians but not all utopians qualify as “Elites.” Elites believe that it is their birthright to rule over the great unwashed masses. They gravitate to politics for no other reason than their burning belief that they are smarter than everyone else. They assume that the “fact” of their superior intelligence and by virtue of the birthright they are qualified to dictate to the rest of us how we should live. Ted Kennedy, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Franklin Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson have implied that they [liberals, socialists, elites] are smarter than the rest of us! Ted Kennedy openly declared it on several occasions, even from the floor of the Senate. 


Joe Biden, in his miserable 1988 presidential bid, said in response to a voter that had the sheer gall to disagree with him that, “I have a much higher IQ than you do.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1j0FS0Z6ho


Woodrow Wilson - “We want one class of persons to have a liberal education, and we want another class of persons, a very much larger class of necessity in every society, to forgo the privilege of a liberal education and fit themselves to perform specific difficult manual tasks.” (In other words, the ruling class should better be educated than the rest of us…) We have established that the Elites do not speak English and they look upon the rest of us as lowborn plebs, not able to make intelligent decisions about our own life. 


Now let’s look at the key word, “broken.” The dictionaries define “broken” as “not functioning properly; out of working order.” It is easy for rational thinking people to conclude, using English, that our immigration system would not be broken if the existing laws were enforced. Therefore, if enforcing existing law would fix the broken immigration system and the government refuses to enforce those existing laws then it must be concluded that politicians have a goal other than enforcing the law thereby fixing the broken system. They are using a politician’s definition for “broken.”

All Democrats and most Republicans in Congress view getting reelected as their primary job. They use rhetoric, government money and power to insure that reelection. Democrats know that the country is starting to swing back to rationality so they are desperate for votes. They need to secure their America hating voter base (the utopians) as well as increasing the head count of those indebted to them for their existence. In the mind of liberal elites, fixing immigration means weakening those laws, weakening the southern border, and weakening voter laws. In their mind enforcing immigration law would break the system even more because it would make it considerably more difficult for them to get reelected. So, to return to our original premise, we shall define "broken" as understood by liberals. "Broken" means there are still immigration laws on the books that, if enforced, will reduce the Democrat voter count.


Fixing the "broken" system means doing away with laws that impede the free flow of Democrat voters into the country.


If current immigration laws are enforced, the number of Democrat voters will steadily decline. That can't be allowed to happen! This is the engine powering government policy including sanctuary cities and states!


Link to this blog post, copy and paste this URL  https://tinyurl.com/ya8we5ms

No comments:

Post a Comment